It looks deceptively simple, but is very powerful. It supports all plugin types, it has a very straightforward audio and midi sequencing capacity. I honestly think that Qtractor has the potential to overtake Ardour in time. You can import wav as samples, but that's about it. But one huge drawback is that there's no native audio tracking. It's easy to sequence beats and the plugin layout is intuitive (even if there's no support for LV2). LMMS is a great "plug and play" option if you're just using a midi controller. But, it's not the only option in Linux and your preference has a lot to do with the type of music and audio you make. Your frustration with Linux audio is pretty common, but I think a lot of that has to do with being forced by the available software to understand routing and bread and butter digital audio concerns, like sample rate, DI box support, midi connections, etc.Īrdour is the flagship Linux DAW because of its polish, comprehensiveness, and support in Windows and Mac OS. That's true of most FLOSS, Linux software. The Ardour forums are useful, though, and I think it's a pretty responsive community ( ). There's surprisingly little point-by-point reference material beyond the manual. Honestly, the manual/wiki is the best written resource ( ). The unfa videos are the best resource, at least for video tutorials. might be 10 minutes might be 2 days, it's IRC and these people do this on their own personal time. IRC can be a slow moving medium where conversations can last for days so don't get impatient, just ask your question and wait. They will answer any questions you throw at them. I sit in the IRC chat on freenode that is populated with the developers. But the manual is a really explicit document. Just stick with it and learn what you need to know as you realize you need to know it. I guess what I am getting at is don't be too hard on yourself if Ardour seems challenging. However I still feel like there are books that could be written about what I don't know about Ardour. Once I had a grip on jack then Ardour seemed overly complex, but I stuck with it and I have recorded mixed and mastered quite a lot over the last decade. And Ardour seemed a perfect choice to me because I have been using GNU/Linux and OSS mostly exclusively since 1995. I'm came to Ardour about 10 years ago as a musician looking to record myself. On the other hand if you have never used a pro grade DAW software then I can certainly see where this would look very intimidating. So if you were coming into this as a recording engineer that has used protools, once you have gotten past jack and setting up your audio interface under Linux then it's pretty smooth sailing from there. The developers of Ardour have patterned the UI to be vaguely ProTools-ish. But from a different perspective the learning curve might not seem so onerous. My secondary question - is there a good tutorial? Beyond beginner stuff, but less stuffy than trying to read through the entire documentation like a book. a lot of power potentially, but a counter-intuitive, very complicated interface? So my main question for you guys: is it just me, or is it a fair assessment to say that overall, Ardour is to DAWs exactly what GIMP is to photo manipulation and graphics? I.e. Just doing what i can seems to take a ridiculous amount of mouse clicks and drilling around into menus, when i have all these knobs and buttons on the nektar which I haven't been able to integrate yet. I still feel like there is a lot going on in ardour that I don't begin to understand. It took me a LONG time to work through all the technicalities of consistently getting my set up working on linux. (Since I am a poor retired person, free is my price point.) After trial and error, ardour seems the best free DAW. I only will use linux and bsd on my own computers. I just like to mess around with music creation as a hobby. I got a nektar 88 key midi keyboard off craigslist early last year.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |